Badiou's Versus Levina's Works Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Badious Versus Levinas Works - Essay ExampleThere are some of the differences and similarities between Badious and Levinas thinking. Badiou holds the view that ism is based on four-spot fundamental conditions that include art, science, politics and love. Each of these four conditions is fully independent from the former(a) as right procedures. Badiou insists that philosophy has to avoid a situation where it allow be in a position to give its whole intellectual endeavors to any of the truth procedures a situation referred to as suturing. If by any chance this is allowed to occur (which was the mainly the case during the 19th and the twentieth centuries), the outcome that results from it is what he referred to as a philosophical disaster. Hence according to Badious thinking, philosophy is a way of thinking concerning the compossibility of the said truth procedures through investigating the relations between the eccentric truth procedures. For instance, the relation between art and love in the case of a novel or it may be d wiz through the more conventionally philosophical role, whereby the categories are turn to such(prenominal) as truth or subject (Barker 64). According to Badiou, the four truth procedures are genuinely addressed by philosophy as irrelevant to suturing desertion of philosophy. Theoretical term is a decided character that is associated with philosophy i.e. aesthetics as opposed to art, metapolitics as opposed to politics and ontology as opposed to science. Truth in the case of Badiou is considered as a philosophical category. In philosophy, some(prenominal) conditions are truth procedures that is to say that the resultant product of their pursuance is truth and it is only philosophy that can refer to these several truth procedures as so. For instance, the buff does not regard her feelings as a question of truth save she only sees it as a question of love. It is only a philosopher who sees the love of a true lover as a apocalypse of tru th. Badious concept of truth is a very meticulous one and is heavily against the direction of much of the modern European thought. At once, he accepts the conventional contemporary model that truths are said to be indisputably invariant that is, they are always everywhere, eternal and do not change. throughout his work, Badious notion of truth has uncoupled self evidence and the idea of invariance which does not alone denote self evidence besides uncoupling the notion of relativity from the notion of constructedness i.e. constructedness does not result to relativism (Levina and Bradley 67). Levinas work is centered primarily on the ethics of the other. According to him, the other is unknown and consequently cannot be objectified into the self as in the case of traditional metaphysics. He prefers to see philosophy as the soundness of love rather than the love of wisdom. Levina derives the basis of his philosophy in ethics from the understanding of the interaction with each(prenom inal) other. According to him, this encounter is a privileged phenomenon whereby the proximity of the other person is felt intensely. The revelation of the other person is not to negate in a phenomenal of calmness. Also the faces revelation entails a demand which is before the expression or knowledge of one